Skip to Main Content

Publishing in the Life Sciences

Formatting your article for final submission

When authors take on the task of writing up their research for publication, it is good practice to prepare the report in a format that resembles most closely the final submission. In order to prepare, it helps if researchers pre-select the publication (in the life sciences, usually a peer-reviewed journal) to which they intend to submit.

Ready to Publish: Selecting a Journal

Tips for choosing a publication

Which journals may publish your article?

  • Ask colleagues for advice about which journal to publish in
  • Look at the references in your article
    • Which journal(s) appear?
    • Which journals appear in your references' references?
  • Search your research topic in a database in your field (e.g., MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, BIOSIS, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection).
    • Browse the results and see which publications tend to publish on your topic
  • Search for you research topic in Scopus
    • Use the "Source Title" filter to see which journals have published the most articles on the topics related to your search and research
  • Check the Instructions to Authors pages of the journals that interest you
    • You may also wish to email the journal to find out if the subject fits in the publication's scope, or in a particular theme issue.
    • Note: Author guidelines will also include important information like citation style, inclusion of data sets, etc.
  • Consider the intended audience of the journal
    • e.g., If the journal only publishes medical articles of general interest on research on humans, they may not consider your manuscript on translational regulation of release factor 2, no matter how good it is

 

Check for quality

  • What is the quality of the articles published in the journal? Read a few of the journal's published articles.
  • Is it a scholarly/research journal or a trade publication?
  • Does it have a peer review process?
  • Determine the popularity and prestige of the journal, using impact measures such as the InCites Journal Citation Reports (JCR) Impact Factor. Double-check impact factors that are posted on journal websites: These may not use JCR data, and IFs not published by JCR may be less meaningful to the academic community. See other metrics such as Eigenfactor, and CiteScore.  See this guide to learn more about impact factors and metrics.
  • Useful Checklist for Review of Journal Quality: Blobaum, Paul M., "Blobaum’s Checklist for Review of Journal Quality for Submission of Scholarly Manuscripts" (2013). Faculty Research and Creative Activity. 27.

 

Check for legitimacy

 

Consider open access

 

Consider publishing or preregistering your study protocol

  • BioMedCentral journals such as Trials may offer this option, as well as other journals like BMJ Open. Some PLoS journals now also offer preregistration. If you are trying to find journals that accept protocols, try doing a search on your topic and adding "protocol" (or "study protocol" OR "trial protocol", for example) as a title word search in your search strategy, just to get a quick sense of where protocols related to your topic (and maybe to your study design) are published.
  • Systematic reviews with a health-related outcomes can be registered at PROSPERO, and for those undertaking reviews for collaborations like Cochrane, for example, protocol publication may be mandatory.
  • You can use platforms like OSF Registries to "publish" protocols or study preregistrations as well. 

 

Is the timing right?

  • The publication's lag time is the time it takes once a manuscript is accepted for it to be published. This can range from immediately (in the case of some online open access publishers) to more than a year.
  • The lag time for review is also of importance. If it is not stated in the author guidelines, ask the editor how long it usually takes for a submission to be reviewed. Note that it is considered inappropriate to submit a manuscript to more than one journal at a time.
  • Use caution: An extremely short review time may be a red flag indicating that the peer review process is nonexistent or superficial.

Additional resources for journal selection

  • Jocalyn Clark: How to Avoid Predatory Journals—A Five Point Plan - Posted on BMJ Blogs, recommended by Trish Groves, Head of Research, BMJ, Editor-in-Chief, BMJ Open
  • Genamics JournalSeek - A categorized database of over 75000 journal titles with basic information
  • JANE: Jounal/Author Name Estimator - Insert your title and/or abstract and the system suggests journal titles suitable for your topic
  • Elsevier Journal Finder - Insert your title, abstract, and field(s) of research and the system suggests journal titles suitable for your topic; information provided includes impact factor, open access status, editorial times, acceptance rates, and production times. Limited to journals published by Elsevier
  • List of Journals Indexed for MEDLINE  (U.S. National Library of Medlcine) - Inclusion in MEDLINE can be used as an indicator of journal quality (Note: Journals may be included in PubMed but not indexed in MEDLINE)
  • Open access journals - Consult this list to select an open access journal
  • SHERPA: Publisher Copyright Policies & Self-Archiving (University of Nottingham)
  • Ulrichsweb - Search or browse for publications in all disciplines

Schulich Librarians

Profile Photo
Schulich Librarians
Contact:
Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering
514-398-4769
Website

Questions?

McGill LibraryQuestions? Ask us!
Privacy notice