The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) provides guidance and best practices related to scholarly publishing and ethics.
Below is a select list of publications new editors may wish to review:
COPE also provides many resources related to handling conflicts of interest, plagiarism, authorship challenges etc.
Example open data policies:
See also Guidelines for journals that wish to establish a data policy (Ouvrir la Science).
As AI tools in the scholarly publishing lifecycle are developed and implemented, journals are creating policies to address usage of these technologies in academic scholarship. We recommend that journals consider drafting a policy for their journal regarding use of AI technologies in the publication process. This should include reference to how AI tools are or aren’t permitted for use in the preparation of the manuscript as well as how it may or may not be used in the editorial process by reviewers or journal editors.
The uses and policies governing the use of AI in scholarly publishing are rapidly evolving. The following is a simple summary of the current conversation.
COPE Position on Authorship and AI Tools
ICJME: Defining the role of authors and contributors: Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Technology
STM: Generative AI in Scholarly Communications
Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA)
Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication (JLSC)
You may also wish to consult this list of AI Policies by major academic publishers (guide built and maintained by Purdue University)
McGill Libraries • Questions? Ask us!
Privacy notice