McGill University Library has a subscription to Covidence, a useful tool for importing database records, removing duplicate records, screening, documenting critical appraisal/risk of bias and data extraction, and exporting data. Covidence also allows members of the McGill community to invite external reviewers to join their review team.
For access and support for Covidence, please consult: https://support.covidence.org/help/mcgill-university-library
Note: This procedure helps you keep track of the information that will be needed to report the methods in the article and also to fill in the PRISMA flow diagram.
The steps below cover Ovid MEDLINE, Embase Classic+Embase on Ovid, PubMed, and CINAHL on EBSCO.
We recommend exporting RIS files that can be imported into Covidence for deduplication and screening.
You can use EndNote or other citation software as an intermediary step, although it is not required. EndNote is useful for managing references and full text.
We often start by exporting records from Ovid MEDLINE, if applicable (you may have decided to only use PubMed to search MEDLINE; those instructions are below):
There are a couple of options for documenting your PubMed search:
McGill University Library has an institutional license for Covidence. For access and support for Covidence, please consult: https://support.covidence.org/help/mcgill-university-library
Covidence removes duplicate records automatically. The Covidence support pages explain the process in detail.
Please note: It has been reported that exporting records from Ovid databases in RIS format results in better removal of duplicates than exporting records from Ovid databases in EndNote format.
Selection of studies supporting the use of Covidence for the task of removing duplicates:
Janka H, Metzendorf M-I. High precision but variable recall–comparing the performance of five deduplication tools. J EAHIL. 2024;20(1):12-7.
McKeown S, Mir ZM. Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):38.
You can use one of the following methods to remove duplicates from a merged EndNote library.
Before deduplicating, you will need a merged EndNote library containing the records from all your separate EndNote libraries (if applicable) for the individual database searches, if you had previously exported records from each database into separate libraries:
Using this merged library of records from your individual database searches, you are now ready to remove duplicates. Here are two methods you can use:
1) Earlier version of "Bramer method" for deduplicating, with steps provided in Word document format:
Paper describing more advanced configuration options for removing duplicates in EndNote: Bramer WM, Giustini D, de Jonge GB, Holland L, Bekhuis T. De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote. J Med Libr Assoc. 2016;104(3):240-243. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.104.3.014
Create a compressed library for backup after having removed as many duplicates as possible, with a filename like SearchTerms-yyyymmdd-Deduplicated—xRecords.enlx. This will be the library for screening. You can then export this deduplicated record set from EndNote to Covidence:
Use the online Deduplicator tool.
The offline DeDuplicator (old version) may be useful for large sets of records (which used to be considered ≥ 2000). Download the SRA-dedupe-UI application from GitHub. As of October 2020, there were only Linux and Windows versions available.
Keep a copy of the RIS or XML file for your records.
See also: Rathbone J, Carter M, Hoffmann T, Glasziou P. Better duplicate detection for systematic reviewers: evaluation of Systematic Review Assistant-Deduplication Module. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):6.
Refer to the PRISMA 2020 checklists (including an expanded version with additional guidance) for more information on how to report your systematic review.
Refer to the PRISMA searching (PDF, Word, or Excel) guidance for more information on how to report your searches
Complete the PRISMA flow diagram
See also: Rethlefsen ML, Page MJ. PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram. J Med Libr Assoc. 2022;110(2):253-257. doi:10.5195/jmla.2022.1449
See the Search Documentation Template for an example of the types of information you should be tracking and recording:
McGill Libraries • Questions? Ask us!
Privacy notice