Skip to Main Content

Citation Justice in STEMM

What is citation justice?

Citation justice involves intentionally acknowledging and citing the work of researchers from underrepresented groups. Research indicates that women, and Black, Indigenous, and People of Colour (BIPoC) scholars are cited less frequently than their white, male counterparts (Dworkin et al., 2020; Kozlowski et al, 2022). In science, technology, engineering, math, and medicine, practising citation justice means striving to equalize citation rates between white cis-male authors and those from diverse backgrounds and identities.

Who is this guide for?

Engaging with literature is an important part of learning and research. Whether you are exploring a new topic, or preparing to publish on one you've studied for years, it's important to seek out diverse sources in order to gain a variety of perspectives. You can find tips and resources for expanding your sources in the finding diverse sources and academic databases for diverse sources sections of this guide. If you are writing a paper or preparing a conference presentation, take a look at the tips for auditing your citations. Instructors or anyone working with students should take a look at the in the classroom section of the guide.

This guide is a work in progress, so please share any suggestions you have! I’d also love to hear about your experiences with this type of work.

Why does citation justice matter?

"One important way to counter citational disparities is to expand the range of scholarship with which we critically engage."

(Chakravartty et al., 2018).

Citation justice leads to student success

Practising citation justice is imperative in the context of education, as the researchers featured in reading lists, syllabi, lectures, and journal clubs shape students' perceptions of authority in their fields. This representation can either foster a sense of belonging or lead to feelings exclusion within their chosen discipline, depending on whether students see themselves represented in the works cited. By de-centering Whiteness and elevating the voices of traditionally underrepresented researchers, we can have a profound impact on our students' success and engagement in science (Intoumpor-Beukers, 2024, Thomas, 2022). Developing inclusive reading lists and lectures better reflects the identities and experiences of our students!

Citation justice leads to the success of scholars

Discussions around how and when to cite sources happen regularly in university settings, but we rarely consider who is being cited. Yet, decisions around citations have real and significant implications on the lives of individuals and their scientific advancement. As aptly noted by Andrea Eidinger (2023) "...just as citational practices have the potential to reinforce power structures, they also have tremendous potential to undo them."

To promote greater diversity in the academe, a good starting point is to examine whose voices are being amplified. Davies, S. et al, (2021) state that "[c]itation metrics...influence career advancement at all levels including graduate opportunities, funding success, career positions, awards, distinctions, and tenure and promotion. However, a lack of diversity among the most cited scientific authors is driven by historical demographics of faculty and those in academic leadership positions."

Citation justice leads to innovation

Research indicates that demographically diverse teams foster greater scientific innovation (Hofstra et al., 2020). However, women and other marginalized groups remain underrepresented in scientific publishing (Kozlowski et al. 2022). Hofstra et al. (2020) have found that "novel contributions by gender and racial minorities are taken up by other scholars at lower rates than novel contributions by gender and racial majorities, and equally impactful contributions of gender and racial minorities are less likely to result in successful scientific careers than for majority groups."

Diversity in who we cite increases the diversity in who is doing research, which increases scientific innovation

Practicing citation justice can lead to the success of minoritized students and  scholars. As stated by Kozlowski et al.(2022) "...the diversification of the scientific workforce is necessary to create a scientific system whose results benefit all of society."

Considerations

Taking a critical look at your citational practice takes time and commitment.

Some important questions to consider when beginning this work include:

  • What are the things I consider important when deciding who/what to cite?
  • Who are the stand out 'experts' in my field?
  • Who does the research I am citing benefit?
  • Are the sources I am using representative of global knowledge?
  • Do structures of power impact knowledge production in my discipline?

 

It's also important to think about where you have the ability to uplift the work of researchers from underrepresented groups.

For example:

  • Do you have suggested or required readings listed in your syllabi?
  • Do you supervise students?
  • Who are the people you collaborate with?
  • Do you peer review the work of your colleagues?
  • Are you involved in planning conferences or panels?
  • Are you the editor of an academic journal?

Librarian

Profile Photo
Andrea Miller-Nesbitt
she/her/elle
Contact:
Schulich Library of Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, and Engineering (Office located in the McLennan Library Building during the Schulich closure)
514-398-1663
Website

Citations

  • Baffour, T., Garcia, M., & Rich, M. (2024). Advancing the grand challenge to eliminate racism: a call to action for citational justice in social work. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2024.2406257
  • Chakravartty, P., Kuo, R., Grubbs, V., & McIlwain, C. (2018). # communicationsowhite. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 254-266. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy003
  • Chen, S., Binning, K. R., Manke, K. J., Brady, S. T., McGreevy, E. M., Betancur, L., ... & Kaufmann, N. (2021). Am I a science person? A strong science identity bolsters minority students’ sense of belonging and performance in college. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(4), 593-606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220936480
  • Davies, S. W., Putnam, H. M., Ainsworth, T., Baum, J. K., Bove, C. B., Crosby, S. C., ... & Bates, A. E. (2021). Promoting inclusive metrics of success and impact to dismantle a discriminatory reward system in science. PLoS biology, 19(6), e3001282. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001282
  • Dworkin, J., Zurn, P., & Bassett, D. S. (2020). (In) citing action to realize an equitable future. Neuron, 106(6), 890-894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.05.011
  • Eidinger, A. (2019). Cultivating a Conscientious Citation Practice | Unwritten Histories. https://www.unwrittenhistories.com/cultivating-a-conscientious-citation-practice/. Accessed September 18, 2024.
  • Hofstra, B., Kulkarni, V. V., Munoz-Najar Galvez, S., He, B., Jurafsky, D., & McFarland, D. A. (2020). The Diversity–Innovation Paradox in Science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(17), 9284–9291. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915378117
  • Intoumpor-Beukers, E. C. (2024). Sense of Belonging of Underrepresented Students: Role of Faculty Inclusiveness and Online versus Campus Learning (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University). https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=16580&context=dissertations
  • Kozlowski, D., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., & Monroe-White, T. (2022). Intersectional inequalities in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(2), e2113067119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2113067119
  • Pandey, S., & Burch-Smith, T. (2024). Overcoming citation bias is necessary for true inclusivity in Plant Science. The Plant Cell, 36(1), 10-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koad248
  • Thomas, D. S. (2022). Pluralised realities: Reviewing reading lists to make them more culturally sensitive. In Diversity, Inclusion, and Decolonization (pp. 110-124). Bristol University Press. https://mcgill.on.worldcat.org/oclc/1372507885

McGill LibrariesQuestions? Ask us!
Privacy notice